In support of Trump

We thought we as a society had advanced beyond the beliefs and attitudes espoused by Trump and his followers — we thought that we were better. We were wrong because there is no universal we, and there probably is not even a good way to know what’s better. Elections are not about policies or facts. They have always been about values. Values and morals evolve unevenly across populations and time. With more rapid economic or moral upheaval comes a larger gap between those leading the charge — progressives — and those valuing stability and what once was — conservatives. Stretch the rubber band far enough, quickly enough, and it snaps.


Trump wouldn’t be my first choice for a president, but he’s been able to accomplish something that no one else seemed to be: making a large faction of our society — the rural, Evangelical, and blue collar — feel heard by acknowledging that their plight is real and it matters. Losing something is subjectively much more painful than an equivalent gain (this can be witnessed through loss aversion). Unfortunately, in addition to raising the status of, and granting rights to, those that were previously downtrodden by the white male majority, we have simultaneously rubbed it in the faces of rural white men, who enjoy Jesus and NASCAR, that their world is backward and they’re stupid. It’s no coincidence that everyone feels OK using them as the butt of jokes (which still pass for being politically correct).

We are lucky to live in a country that celebrates diversity and freedom. Not everyone will share each other’s values, and that’s fine as long as we can continue to find ways to compromise. The first step of compromise is acknowledging your adversary’s perspective and values. Cries of outrage, demands for secession and threats of individual exit (renunciation of citizenship) will not help bridge the rift that has formed between large factions of our society. Congratulations to those that participated in the democratic process. The system has done its job and selected a candidate which is probably a good reflection of the makeup of our current society. The way forward is only through compromise and communication, specifically with those people that you find alien and unrelatable. The next four years will be a good opportunity to practice our ability to appreciate those with different systems of values — perhaps we can learn something from them and similarly they can learn something from us. Together the country can come out stronger than before.

Also published on Medium.

2 thoughts on “In support of Trump

  1. What gets me is that the people looking out for rural America from a economic and standard living standpoint have been Democrats. Obama saved middle America during the most recent recession with aggressive bailouts and stimulus spending. Coming from Michigan with a father than works at an auto company, I know how close at least two of the auto companies were to going bankrupt and leaving a ton of people jobless.

    When all government oversight gets dismantled, the poorest, and least educated are going to be hurt the most (think of an environmental disasters, Flint water poisoning, financial crisis, etc.) The last 8 years has stabilized middle and lower America at the expense of upper America tax and subsidy-wise (although QE has more than made up for this for most wealthy individuals who are well invested.)

    I have a hard time buying the argument that rural America voted in their self interest.

    1. Yes that may be but given the complexity of policy and the underlying uncertainty, in practice basically no one is qualified to judge them. So even the rational decision is probably to vote on values and perception

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.